|
Leonardo da Vinci, Last Supper
Italian, 1498
Milan, Friary of Santa Maria delle Grazie |
In my earlier essays on the question of how the figure of
St. John the Evangelist has been portrayed in the history of western art since
the Middle Ages we have seen that, although at times shown as an mature (or
even old) bearded figure, St. John is most often shown as a youthful, beardless
man. So, we have finally come to the
crux of the question “is the figure sitting at the right hand of Jesus in
Leonardo DaVinci’s Last Supper a man or a woman?”
Obviously we must begin to answer this question by reviewing
how the figure of John was presented in earlier images of the Last Supper. Is he shown as a mature man or as a young boy
or man?
|
Anonymous, Fresco of Meal
Early Christian, 346-355
Rome, Catacomb of Marcellinus and Peter |
First of all, we should look at what are believed to be the
earliest representations of what may be the Last Supper, from the early
Christian centuries. These are paintings
in the Roman catacombs, dating to the third and fourth centuries. They show us images of a typical banquet in
the ancient world, where the participants sit or recline around a table. However, it is by no means clear that these
are actually paintings of the Last Supper, they may be simply representations
of the fraternal meal that often accompanied the early Christian
liturgies.
It is not until a few centuries later that we can definitely
begin to say that the image we see is truly a representation of the Last
Supper.
|
Anonymous, Last Supper
From The Rossano Gospels
Greek, 6th century
Rossano, Diocesan Museum |
In the Rossano Gospels, dating
from the sixth century, we can be certain that we are seeing Jesus, seated at a
semi-circular table with His disciples, including Judas who is distinguished
from the others by reaching into the dish.
But, we can say with some certainty that John is not the disciple seated
next to Jesus. This white haired, white
bearded figure is probably Peter. John
may be the young, bearded man seated next to Peter, or he may even be one of
the other young, beardless disciples. We
simply have no clues to help us identify him.
Two hundred years farther on the image in the Drogo
Sacramentary, produced in Carolingian France, is not more helpful. All the disciples look alike, including Judas
who is again shown reaching for the dish, and none of them sit immediately next
to Jesus.
|
Anonymous, Last Supper and Betrayal
from Sacramentary of Drogo
Carolingian (Metz), ca. 850
Paris, Bibliotheque nationale de France
MS Latin 9428, fol.44v
|
It isn’t till another two hundred years later that we begin
to be able to identify John.
|
Anonymous, Last Supper
Crete, 1001-1300
Crete, Monastery of Agia Triada |
Around the
year 1000, we begin to see images that include the figure of a youthful
disciple who leans his head against Jesus.
The earliest seem to come from the Byzantine Empire and the lands
influenced by it.
|
Anonymous, Last Supper
from Gospel Book
Egyptian (Damietta), 1178-1180
Paris, Bibliotheque nationale de France
MS Copte 13, fol. 76v |
The image passes into western art through the medium of mosaics and during the twelfth century becomes the standard image for representing the Last Supper.
|
Anonymous Mosaicist, Entry into Jerusalem and Last Supper
Italian (Monreale), 1180s
Monreale, Cathedral (detail of west transept wall) |
|
Anonymous, Last Supper
from Gospels of Matilda
Italian (Lombardy), 1080-1099
New York, Pierpont Morgan Library
MS M 492, fol. 100v |
|
Anonymous, Last Supper
from Gospel Book
Austrian (Salzburg), 11th Century
New York, Pierpont Morgan Library
MS G 44, fol. 80r |
|
Anonymous, Last Supper
German, 1245-1260
Naumberg, Cathedral of Saints Peter and Paul, Detail of West Choir
|
|
Maitre Henri, Last Supper
from Livre d'images de Madame Marie
Belgian (Hainault), 1285-1290
Paris, Bibliotheque nationale de France
MS Nouvelle acquisition francaise 16251, fol. 30v
|
By 1300 it is the established image.
|
Duccio, Last Supper
Italian, 1308-1311
Siena, Museo dell'Opera del Duomo |
Frequently, John is shown leaning against Jesus, as if
asleep. Sometimes he is shown as if
asleep on the table. Occasionally he is
shown awake and alert.
|
Pietro Lorenzetti, Last Supper
Italian, ca. 1320
Assisi, Lower Church of S. Francesco
|
|
Andrea del Castagno, Last Supper
Italian, 1447
Florence, Sant' Apollonia
|
|
Andrea del Castagno, Last Supper (detail) |
|
Pietro Perugino, Last Supper
Italian, 1483-1496
Foligno, Convent of the Tertiary Franciscans |
But, from the
eleventh century on he is almost always depicted as a young, beardless
man. His clothing, consisting of a long
tunic and collarless cloak, just like the other Apostles and Jesus Himself, is
definitely masculine. In some pictures
John’s hair is long, in others it is relatively short.
Finally, we come to the picture that has inspired so much
speculation, the
Last Supper by Leonardo DaVinci. It was painted by Leonardo for the refectory
(dining room) of the monastery of Santa Marie delle Grazie in Milan in the last
years of the fifteenth century. This
painting, like the Mona Lisa, is one of the most famous ever painted. Like other Leonardo paintings it became the
new paradigm against which the work of other artists was measured and from
which others took their own inspiration.
It is also another in the long list of Leonardo’s lost or ruined
experiments in painting.
|
Leonardo da Vinci, Last Supper
Italian, 1498
Milan, Friary of Santa Maria delle Grazie |
Leonardo was many things and one of them was an inventor of
experimental techniques. For this
important commission he chose, not the safe and tested medium of fresco for a
wall of this size, but an experimental technique of his own, using a wax medium
on dry wall. This was a technique that
had some historical basis but which had not been tried for centuries. He decided to try to revive it. His experiment was not successful. Within a few years of completion, the work
began to peel off the wall. It has been
repainted and restored multiple times in its long life. Consequently, we can really say very little
about the surface of the work, we can really only speak of its composition and
of the effects it had on those who came after Leonardo.
|
Leonardo da Vinci, Last Supper
Detail showing the group of Peter, John and Judas and the ruinous state of the painting surface. |
It is in its composition as well as in its technique that
Leonardo’s Last Supper was revolutionary.
And it is in its composition that it is most successful and had the
greatest impact. Other artists had tried
to enliven the sense of a row of nearly identical faces by showing interactions
between them. Leonardo created a grand
masterpiece of drama in the way in which his cast of Apostles interact. Arranged in four groups of three figures
each, they argue, they call the attention of others to the actions of Jesus, who
has just said that the bread is his body and the wine is his blood. They react with surprise and
astonishment. Their actions reveal
things about their personalities and about their place among the entire group
of disciples. Some of these personality
traits were determined by the traditions related to each of the figures. For example, Peter was long recognized as
having the kind of personality that reacts in extremes. He is the first to vehemently assure Jesus of
his faithfulness, the first to react violently to Jesus’ arrest in Gethsemane
and the first to vehemently deny even knowing him a few hours later! Thus is easy to identify the figure of Peter
among the disciples. He is the
white-haired man (a traditional attribute) who lunges forward to tap John the
Evangelist on the shoulder.
Likewise, Judas can readily be identified. He is the one just in front of Peter, who
seems to recoil as he clutches a small bag, possibly containing the thirty
pieces of silver for which he betrayed Jesus.
And what of John? As
we have seen, he is traditionally seen as the young beardless man seated next
to Jesus who is passive enough to be asleep, either slumped on the table or leaning
against Jesus. In Leonardo’s image he
becomes the beardless young man seated next to Jesus who seems to pull back
quietly from the table as he listens to the words of Peter who has tapped him
on the shoulder. But, the argument
goes, this figure looks like a woman.
How can you be so sure it is John?
|
Leonardo da Vinci, Last Supper
Detail of head of St. John |
Well, there are some clues.
While it is difficult to see the figure in the painting in its current near
ruined (though recently restored) state, one can examine it to some
extent. There are close ups of the
figures. There are studies for it. And there is Leonardo’s own style in dealing
with images of young men to be considered.
No artist paints such a monumental work without planning and
preparation. Studies of the figures and
for the composition itself exist. Some
of the compositional drawings suggest that the original idea was a much more
traditional depiction, with a sleeping John and with Judas on the other side of
the table.
|
Leonardo da Vinci, Study for the Last Supper
Italian, ca. 1494-1495
Venice, Galleria dell'Accademia |
Other drawings are studies
for the heads of the Apostles and one of them is of the head of John. One can see more clearly from this study that
the figure is male. His clothing is that
of a man, not a woman, and there is a certain masculinity about his
features.
|
Leonardo da Vinci, Study for Head of John the Evangelist |
Further, a look at some of Leonardo’s other paintings of
young male figures, such as John the Baptist, reveal that Leonardo tended to
make them more effeminate in character than when he painted older males. This is a recognizable and well known feature
of Leonardo’s work that was manifested throughout his career.
|
Leonardo da Vinci, Annunication
Detail of Angel Gabriel
Italian, 1478-1482
Paris, Musée du Louvre |
|
Leonardo da Vinci, St. John the Baptist
Italian, 1513-1516
Paris, Musée du Louvre |
Therefore, it is safe to say that the figure seated to the
right of Jesus in the Last Supper is not Mary Magdalene, but John the
Evangelist. Indeed, this identity has
never been in doubt until the last few years and the ill informed speculations
of some authors with little knowledge of iconographic tradition or the work of
Leonardo as a whole.
© M. Duffy, 2014