New Yorkers are blessed this summer with two exhibitions which center around paintings of religious subjects from the seventeenth century, one at the Frick and the other at the Met. They share a century and are both expressions of the Baroque, but they couldn’t be more different, both in scale and in tone.
At the Frick
The first show centers around a tiny painting by Rembrandt,
called “Divine Encounter: Rembrandt’sAbraham and the Angels”. This painting
measures only 6-3/8 inches by 8-3/8 inches, about the size of a trade paperback
book. But into that small space
Rembrandt poured a monumental composition in miniature that includes not only
Abraham and the three angels, but also a landscape, the façade of Abraham’s
house and his wife, Sarah. Typically for
Rembrandt, he uses variations in lighting to help tell the story, which is
drawn from Genesis 18:1-15. Abraham is
visited by the Lord, who appears as three men to whom Abraham offers
refreshment and food. The visitors predict
that Sarah will become a mother in her old age.
A visitor to the Frick viewing the tiny Abraham and the Angels Photo: © M. Duffy, 2017 |
In Rembrandt’s interpretation, the tent becomes a house,
seen in shadow surrounded with plants and a tree, with Sarah peering from the
door at the top of a small staircase.
Abraham is shown kneeling before the three, a bowl in one hand and a
pitcher in the other. The three visitors
are reclining and seated in a semi-circle.
A long standing iconographic tradition, going back to the Byzantine
empire, depicted the three visitors as identical angels, representing the Holy
Trinity. However, while Rembrandt does
represent them as winged, his figures are not identical. Clever use of lighting and action emphasizes
their differences.
Rembrandt van Rijn, Abraham Entertaining the Angels Dutch, 1646 Private Collection |
The figure closest to the viewer, shown with wings tucked
behind his back is dressed in reddish robes and appears to have very short
hair. We cannot see his face, which is
turned away from us. Only a sliver of
his profile is illuminated. The middle
figure is not so deeply in shadow, but not yet in full light either. He is eating and his wings are unfurled, but
not yet spread. His reddish-blonde hair
is chin length. The third figure, shown
in dazzling white garments in full light, appears with widespread wings and
golden, shoulder length hair as he gestures toward the hidden Sarah. It is the moment of revelation about the
nature of his visitors and the moment of the promise to Abraham that Sarah will
have a son.
This tiny painting is surrounded by a series of drawings and
prints by Rembrandt that show other moments in the life of Abraham, and even
another version of the same subject. The
exhibition is a charming and interesting exercise in Rembrandt connoisseurship
and well worth the price of admission to the Frick. It runs till August 20.
At the Met
Cristobal de Villalpando, Moses and the Brazen Serpent and the Transfiguration of Jesus Mexican, 1683 Puebla, Catedral de Nuestra Senora de la Immaculada Concepcion |
The other show is also well worth the admission price at the
Met, but is at the opposite end of just about every scale you can imagine. It is “Cristobal de Villalpando: Mexican Painter of the Baroque”. Although it includes 11 paintings (including
one loaned by my undergrad alma mater, Fordham University) the centerpiece of
the exhibition is an enormous, 28-foot tall, altarpiece, lent by the Cathedral
in Puebla, Mexico and exhibited for the first time in a museum.
This huge canvas depicts two different
Biblical scenes. In the lower half we
see the scene from Numbers 21:5-9 wherein the wandering Israelites are attacked
in the desert by serpents, resulting in the death of many people. At God’s instruction Moses makes a serpent of
bronze which he mounts on a pole. Anyone
who has been bitten and looks at it is cured.
In the upper half we see the scene of the Transfiguration of Jesus (which
happens to be the Gospel for this Sunday, August 6, 2017, the feast of the Transfiguration of the Lord) in which Jesus
reveals Himself in His full glory, accompanied by Moses (identified by the
staff with the serpent) and Elijah on clouds as His disciples Peter, James and
John look on.
The relationship between
the two scenes is made obvious by the inclusion in the Transfiguration scene of
the Cross. As the bronze serpent set
upon a pole by Moses cures the snake bitten, so Jesus, when lifted up on the
Cross, as He is lifted up at the Transfiguration will redeem and heal humanity.
A Change in Focus
The collections of paintings in this country were originally
formed by wealthy patrons, like J. P. Morgan or Henry Clay Frick, whose tastes
tended to focus on the art of Europe or of American artists who painted in the
European tradition. Their bequests and
donations gave us the splendors of the Met and other large and small American
museums. However, as with every age,
there were blind spots and gaps in what they provided, which our museums have
been struggling to fill. One area in
which the Met was lacking for decades was in the area of later
seventeenth-century French painting.
Several purchases over the last few years have filled that gap. Another, much bigger, gap was in the area of Latin American
art. The Met has a good collection of
pre-Columbian art and some modern Latin American art, but until recently very
little Spanish Colonial art, leaving a large gap between the sixteenth and the
twentieth centuries. A small show called
“Collecting the Arts of Mexico” , showcasing recent and not so recent acquisitions of Mexican work, has been on display in the American Wing
galleries since last year, It continues through September 4 and is worth
seeing. Now we have this splendid
exhibition of the work of Villalpando which will be with us until October
15.
Villalpando was a native of Mexico City and learned his
craft there. So, although he had access
to the Baroque style through his training and through works of art, especially
through prints of European works, his style does represent a truly American vision. His figures are more ethereal, more agitated
and much more colorful than anything produced during the equivalent period in
Europe. His compositions are often
crowded with figures and frequently are organized in an almost medieval way. Some of his motifs appear to have been his
own inventions, and his pride in them is reflected in his highly visible
signatures, which often read “Cristobal de Villalpando inventor”. As the reviewer for the New York Times suggested
“the outstanding altarpiece from Puebla should be a pilgrimage site of its own
this summer”1. And so should
the little painting at the Frick.
In a subsequent article I will discuss some of the other
paintings by Villalpando that are included in the Met exhibition.
© M. Duffy, 2017
- Farago, Jason. “From Colonial Mexico, a Towering Vision of Grace”, The New York Times, July 26, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/26/arts/design/mexico-cristobal-de-villalpando-metropolitan-museum.html
Scripture texts in this
work are taken from the New American Bible, revised edition © 2010, 1991, 1986,
1970 Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, Washington, D.C. and are used by
permission of the copyright owner. All Rights Reserved. No part of the New
American Bible may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from
the copyright owner.
No comments:
Post a Comment