Hans Memling, Last Judgment Triptych Flemish, c. 1467-1471 Strasbourg, Musée des Beaux-Arts |
it would be better for him if a great millstone were put around his neck
and he were thrown into the sea.”
(Mark 9:42, repeated in Matthew 16:8 and Luke 17:1).
UPDATE: THIS ARTICLE DATES FROM 2018. I AM POSTING IT AGAIN IN RESPONSE TO THE RELEASE BY THE VATICAN OF THE RESULTS OF THEIR INVESTIGATION INTO THE RISE OF FORMER CARDINAL AND PRIEST THEODORE MCCARRICK, THE AMERICAN POSTER BOY FOR SEXUAL ABUSE WITHIN THE CHURCH.
IN ADDITION, THE SURGERY MENTIONED IN THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF THIS ENTRY WAS PERFORMED SUCCESSFULLY ON DECEMBER 12, 2018 AND I HAVE SINCE RECOVERED MOST OF MY FUNCTIONALITY. THANKS BE TO GOD!
This summer has truly been a summer of pain for me. On Friday night, June 29, I went to bed with nothing but the usual “background” pain that I have lived with for a dozen years as the effects of aging have begun to cause a narrowing of the bony tube through which my spinal cord runs. In most places, the narrowing has been minimal but in one or two it has been growing worse in recent years, sometimes causing significant pain in movement, but not truly keeping me from doing most of the things I want to do.
The Alexander Master, Jesus Curing the Paralytic Woman From a History Bible Dutch (Utrecht), c. 1430 The Hague, Koninklijk Bibliotheek MS KB 78 D 38, fol. 170r |
On Saturday morning, June 30, I woke up to a changed
world. I could hardly walk; I could not
straighten up. To avoid piercing pain, I
had to walk bent at a 90o angle.
I needed a cane for support, then a walker. Since that date I have been unable to do
almost all of the things I like and want to do.
I have visited multiple doctors and had multiple tests. The MRI tests reveal the cause of the sudden
onset of this pain – a herniated disc, but also slippage of two of my
vertebrae. I have been forced to take
powerful drugs to reduce my pain and to stabilize the nerves. They help, but cannot relieve the pain even
so far as to get me back to where I was on June 29. I am now facing serious surgery to try
to relieve the terrible pressure on the spinal nerves. All this would be pain enough to occupy my
mind at any time.
However, there has been another pain, which began at about
the same time as my physical pain. This
is the pain of the horrendous revelations about the abuse of children, young
adults and seminarians that have been brought to light by the removal from
public ministry (June 20) and resignation from the College of Cardinals of
Archbishop Theodore McCarrick (July 27), followed by the release of the
Pennsylvania Grand Jury’s Report on sexual abuse in the dioceses of that state
over the entire span of my life (August 14) and the release of Archbishop Carlo
Maria Viganò’s
“testimony” about the cover up of Archbishop McCarrick’s abusive behavior,
which he claimed extended all the way to Pope Francis (August 27). As I write this the latest jabs of pain have
come from Germany, where three times as many children are said to have suffered
abuse over the same time span as in Pennsylvania, and the announcement from many
states attorneys general, including my home state of New York, that they are
also opening investigations into clerical sex abuse.
This psychological pain has been as difficult to bear as the physical pain. And while my physical pain affects no one but myself, this pain is shared by millions of other Catholics all over the world, who are angry, confused and hurting. It is further compounded by the astonishing lack of sensible, honest action from the Holy See and many, though not most, bishops.
This psychological pain has been as difficult to bear as the physical pain. And while my physical pain affects no one but myself, this pain is shared by millions of other Catholics all over the world, who are angry, confused and hurting. It is further compounded by the astonishing lack of sensible, honest action from the Holy See and many, though not most, bishops.
I recognize in this terribly shocking situation the telltale signs of an old story, one that seems to play out every 500 years in the life of the Church. Sadly, it’s happened before. I think of the sixth century, when Saint Benedict was so repulsed by the decadence he found in late Roman/early medieval society that he fled to a cave in the mountains. I think of Saint Peter Damian in the eleventh century, when he strove to reform the Church from exactly the same sins we see revealed today. I think of the sixteenth century, when a series of popes with names like Borgia, della Rovere and Medici lived unedifying lives, culminating in the papacies of Alexander VI Borgia, with his mistresses and brood of acknowledged children, and Julius II della Rovere, with his lust for worldly power and art. Their lifestyles, which revolted many, provided ample material for the onslaught of the Protestant Reformation, which their successor, Leo X Medici, was quite unable to face. And now, in the twenty-first century, right on time, a similar scandal rears its very ugly head. The church always suffers through the sins of those who cause the scandal, but She also always rises, in better shape than She was before.
This time, however, the situation is a bit more serious. The crises of the sixth, eleventh and sixteenth centuries took place in a more confined space, i.e., Europe and, with the exception of the sixth century, in a more unified religious situation, i.e., a Christian Europe. Not since the sixth century has the Church faced a crisis like this in such a hostile environment as we have today. Nevertheless, the knowledge that it has happened before and that the Church has rebounded should be of some comfort, even in what is still likely to be a very bitter and worsening experience. We have not seen the bottom yet, and I fear we have a long way to go before we do see it.
Because it is a visual record of the thought of the past, it can remind us in a graphic way of something that seems to
have been forgotten by those “men of God” who have done these evil deeds. They are sins. They were sins in the first century, they
were sins in the sixth century, as in the eleventh and the sixteenth. And they remain sins today. Sins have consequences, both in this life and
in the next. Grave sins, such as the
sexual abuse of a child or young person, have grave consequences and result,
not just in the damage done to the innocent victim, but to the abuser. The abuser damns himself both in this life
and, far worse, in the next. Without the
acknowledgment of and request for forgiveness of these acts, the abuser chooses
final damnation for himself.
It has become fashionable in recent decades to assume that the loving God who gave himself for us would never condemn anyone to hell, that he will forgive anything. But that is wishful thinking, coming from the kind of mushy La-La land school of Christianity lite that has become all too prevalent since the 1960s. Jesus himself is quoted by the three Synoptic Gospel writers as saying “Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him if a great millstone were put around his neck and he were thrown into the sea.” (Mark 9:42, repeated in Matthew 16:8 and Luke 17:1).
Sin then remains sin now and it is the failure to confront and overcome our darker desires, to be overcome by them and to act on them that is at the heart of the abuse crisis in the church. It is not specifically homosexuality or heterosexuality that is to blame (though by all accounts the majority of persons abused were young boys and young men) but the sin of the priest who acted on his sexual desire, whether its focus was a young boy, or girl, or young man or woman, or older man or woman. It remains a sin even if the object of his desire consented with him, for priests swear a vow of chastity in the single state. That is to remain celibate in perpetuity, not merely to remain unmarried. Therefore, it is sin, period.
The very word “sin” has scarcely been mentioned during this entire
summer, but that is the underlying subject.
It is not the fault of “errors of judgment” or “violation of boundaries”
that is at fault, still less is it “clericalism”. It is plain, old fashioned sin against the
sixth and the ninth commandments. In
that we have lost a sense of what this is really about, we may find it hard to
eradicate. And this is where the subject
becomes most difficult.
In the past times I mentioned, when the church has been in crisis, there has always been radical reform. That reform usually was so radical that it was able to carry the church through about the next 400 years. Then, in the years between 400 and 500 from the previous event, there was a gradual loss of discipline and a softening up that lead, as this has, into the same kind of morass we are in today. Each time, an event has occurred, unexpected, unlooked for, that turned the church around. In the sixth century it was the work of Saint Benedict, who as a young man turned his back on a decadent Rome, and ended up founding the Benedictine order which, as it spread out across Europe, gradually effected reformation of the church and the Christianization of Europe. In the eleventh, it was the work of a series of reforming popes and of Saint Peter Damian, that cleaned out the church and set the stage for the glories of the high middle ages. In the sixteenth, it was the Council of Trent and another series of reforming popes and cardinals that reset the church on a firm footing as it confronted both its own corruption and the challenge of the Protestant Reformation and that opened up the splendid era of the Counter-Reformation and Baroque.
In the twenty-first century, we are still
waiting for the reform that is needed.
Among the sad and painful things that I have witnessed this summer is spiteful
sniping within the elite of the church, as though this were simply another part
of the culture wars and an internal power struggle within the ranks of the
hierarchy, virtually divorced from real people and their very real pain. There has been a near spectacular failure of the
Pope to confront this issue. And,
judging by his record with regard to Chile, he will need to be faced with
radical anger directly before he will confront it. It is not reassuring. So far, the “reforming pope” of the 2013
conclave seems to have only succeeded in drawing around himself a group of men
who appear to share in the very corruption that needs to be excised. Without an equally spectacular reformation of thought and action, we may have a long wait for the real reform so desperately
needed.
We need to return to the acknowledgement that these things are sins, damaging to the sinner as well as to the victim. Further, that they are sins whether
the sinner is a lay person or a cleric.
And the middle ages can teach us something here. They had no doubt about the fate of those who
remain in sin. Long ago I noted, with
some surprise and amusement, that nearly every scene of the Last Judgment or of
the damned writhing in hellfire included a sprinkling of churchmen, as well as
secular authority figures. Look for figures wearing the distinctive headgear of bishops, cardinals and popes, and for the distinctive circular clerical tonsure on the heads of monks and priest in these scenes, as well as for the robes of judges and the crowns of kings. The people saw these
images when they prayed in church and they also appeared in their
Books of Hours. They were not afraid to
acknowledge that sin is sin, that no state in life is exempt from sin, and that
“the wages of sin is death” (Romans 6:23).
Stefan Lochner, Last Judgment German, c. 1435 Cologne, Wallraf-Richartz Museum |
Jan van Eyck and Workshop Assistant, The Last Judgment (Detail of Hell) Dutch, c. 1440-1441 New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art |
Dieric Bouts the Elder, Hell Dutch, c. 1450 Lille, Musée des Beaux-Arts |
Fra Angelico, Last Judgment Italian, c 1450 Berlin, Gemäldegalerie der Staatliche Museen zu Berlin |
Hans Memling, Hell Detail from the Last Judgment Triptych (shown at the top of this essay) Flemish, c. 1467-1471 Strasbourg, Musée des Beaux-Arts |
Master of the Orleans Triptych, Last Judgment French, c. 1500 New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art, Robert Lehman Collection A cardinal appears as one of the damned in the top group. |
Triumph of Death From Trionfi by Petrarch French, c. 1500-1525 Paris, Bibliotheque nationale de France MS Francais 12423, fol. 37v |
Hans Weiditz, Hell German, c. 1520 London, British Museum |
We need to remind ourselves of this truth, whether we are a lay person, a priest, a bishop or a pope and all the more so when we are sinners. For the unrepentant sinner who “causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him if a great millstone were put around his neck and he were thrown into the sea.” (Mark 9:42, repeated in Matthew 16:8 and Luke 17:1). That is the message of our forebears. We would do well to remember it now.
© M. Duffy, 2018
1. Hell-On-Line, a website developed by my former classmate, medieval historian Eileen Gardiner. It can be found at Hell-On-Line Information about the vision of Charles the Fat can be found at Number 30 of the Judeo/Christian Hell section, in the period "Before the Christian Era to 1000 CE", copyright 2007 by Italica Press
1. Hell-On-Line, a website developed by my former classmate, medieval historian Eileen Gardiner. It can be found at Hell-On-Line Information about the vision of Charles the Fat can be found at Number 30 of the Judeo/Christian Hell section, in the period "Before the Christian Era to 1000 CE", copyright 2007 by Italica Press
Scripture texts in this work are taken
from the New American Bible, revised edition © 2010, 1991, 1986, 1970
Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, Washington, D.C. and are used by
permission of the copyright owner. All Rights Reserved. No part of the New
American Bible may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from
the copyright owner.