Although it's somewhat outside the subjects I usually comment on, I thought I might mention the special exhibition now underway at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Called "Impressionism, Fashion, and Modernity" it is a sumptuous and fascinatingly frothy concoction of paintings and clothing from the last four decades of the 19th century.
Claude Monet, Madame Louis Joachim Gaudibert French, 1868 Paris, Musee d'Orsay Exhibited nearby is a virtually identical dress and shawl. |
Day Dress of Grey Silk Faille and Indian Multicolored Wool Shawl French, 1866-1867 New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art www.metmuseum.org |
Gallery View showing painting and original dress |
Albert Bartholome, In the Conservatory French, 1881 Paris, Musee d'Orsay |
Cotton dress worn by Mme. Bartholome French, 1880 Paris, Musee d'Orsay |
Not every dress in the show demonstrates such tight lacing but they do show, in various ways, some restructuring or exaggerated outline of the body: impossible bust lines, and the rather absurd bustle, for instance. They remind me of something my mother told about a woman who was an acquaintance of her parents when she was a child. This woman clung to the old style of dress and was wearing long skirted, corsetted clothing into the 1920s. My mother said that her bustline resembled a table top. And, viewing these "modern" fashions at the Met I can see exactly what she meant!
Some examples of the means by which these unusual effects were achieved are also on display. One gallery includes a display of three corsets, showing varying degrees of cinch in the waist, but all cutting in pretty deeply. Surely our foremothers must have hurt from wearing these contraptions and been very glad to unhook them at the end of a day!
Still, much of the fashion on display is beautiful, either for its fabric or for its workmanship, or for both. A favorite of mine is among the last items in the show, a beautiful, bustled, navy blue silk faille and velvet day dress of American design and workmanship from the late 1880s.
The dress described above is the dress on the right in this gallery view. |
An interesting issue taken up by the show is the effect of mass production and the emergence of the department store on the world of fashion and the reflections this cast in the arts. One instance is the 1874 painting by James Tissot (whose Biblical illustrations have often been seen in this blog) called "The Ball on Shipboard".
Tissot, who initially made his name with paintings in the popularly Romantic style of medievalism, had, in the 1860s emphatically embraced painting modern life, especially fashionable modern life. Although never an Impressionist, he shares many of his themes with them, but was far more acceptable to contemporary taste and, therefore, more financially successful. Until 1884 he continued to paint these fashionable, meticulously rendered works for wealthy patrons. His reversion to Catholicism and the lifework of his two Biblical series came after 1884.
James Tissot, The Ball on Shipboard
French, 1874 Private Collection Note: This is the closest copy I could find for color. However, it has been cropped on the right side. |
Auguste Renoir, Madame Georges Charpentier and Her Children French, 1878 New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art www.metmuseum.org |
This comparison reminds us that some things don't change, such as favoring black for evening wear. It's also interesting to contemplate the lengths to which people, especially women, will go to appear fashionable. We may decry the idiocy of the tight-laced corset or the idea of wearing a skirt covering a metal hoop skirt or a bustle frame, but we see the same dynamic at work today in items such as the ultra high heels currently fashionable.
The show is open until May 27th in the second floor special exhibition galleries. You can learn more on the web at: http://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2013/impressionism-fashion-modernity
No comments:
Post a Comment