Showing posts with label Titian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Titian. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 5, 2022

Our Lady of the Rosary, a Forgotten Battle and an Almost Forgotten Pope


Andrea Vicentino, Battle of Lepanto
Italian, 1603
Venice, Palazzo Ducale

The feast of the Blessed Virgin Mary, under the title of Our Lady of the Rosary, is celebrated on October 7th each year.  This feast was established, under the name of Our Lady of Victory, by Pope Saint Pius V in 1571.

Pope Saint Pius V, the Almost Forgotten Pope

Pius, who reigned from 1566 – 1572, is one of those late 16th-century Counter Reformation popes remembered for helping to pull the Church out of the confusion and gloom that descended on it after the shock of the Reformation. After the frequent scandals that had accompanied the lives of the prince-popes of the High Renaissance (men like Alexander VI, Julius II, Leo X) these were mostly pious men of purpose, who lead fairly austere lives. Pius himself, born Antonio Ghislieri, was a friend of the great Saint Charles Borromeo, one of the leading figures of the Counter-Reformation.

Among the notable events of Saint Pius’ pontificate are the reforms of the breviary and of the liturgy. It is Pius who authorized the Roman Missal that was in use until 1970. However, Pius is mostly remembered in the English speaking world for the promulgation of the bull “Regnans in excelsis“. In this bull, Pius excommunicated Queen Elizabeth I and released her subjects from their allegiance. Although well meant, this set the stage for such sad events as the death of Mary Queen of Scots, the Armada, and the Elizabethan government’s persecution of English Catholics, who were now deemed to be traitors almost by definition.



Girolamo Siciolante da Sermoneta, Battle Standard Carried at Lepanto by the Papal flagship of Admiral Marcantonio Colonna
Italian, c. 1570-1571
Gaeta, Museo Diocesano




What Pius is not remembered for among English speakers is his leadership of the Holy League which gained a tremendous victory in the last great naval battle of the classical world. That is the last great battle between naval forces composed almost entirely of oar-powered galleys. The foe was the previously all-conquering Muslim Ottoman navy.

Martin Rota. The Holy League
Croatian, c.1571
London, Trustees of the British Museum
Here Pope Pius V is shown with his arms spread over the shoulders of King Philip II of
Spain (left) and the Doge Alvise I Mocenigo (right) joining hands to form the Holy League of 1571. God the Father and the Holy Spirit are seen above them, while a male angel holds a crown above the head of the King and a female angel holds the cap of the Doges above the head of Doge Mocenigo.


Lepanto, the Forgotten Battle

Most western people today know little of the Ottoman Empire, although they may have heard of it. From the 14th century the Ottoman Turks (the name comes from the founder of the ruling line, Osman) expanded their rule throughout the remains of the old Byzantine Empire, until, by 1400, all that remained of the Empire was the city of Constantinople itself and some tributary territories in the Balkans and Greece. In spite of desperate efforts by the Byzantines, their Empire, direct descendent of the ancient Roman Empire, fell to the Ottomans, led by their young Sultan, Mehmet II, on May 19, 1453.  Mehmet imposed his religion on his empire, favoring those who converted to Islam and oppressing those who remained Christian, thus laying the foundation for much of the conflict in the region in the centuries that have followed.

From this point on the Ottomans controlled the entire Middle East and Anatolia and pushed both east and west, into Persia and Egypt. From their new foothold in Europe they also began to push north into Central Europe, conquering Hungary and reaching Vienna in 1529, although they were unsuccessful in their attempts to take it.* 

The Ottomans also organized a fleet, which began to capture the islands of the Mediterranean, and they began to harass the Mediterranean mainland, especially in Italy.


Anonymous, Battle of Lepanto
Italian, after 1571
Greenwich (UK), National Maritime Museum



In 1570 they began their attack on Cyprus, then a possession of the Venetian Republic. Finally, the powers of Southern Europe became willing to follow the urgings of Pope Pius and to unite in the Holy League. They gathered a fleet to meet the Turkish navy. The command was given to Don John of Austria, an illegitimate son of the former Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V, and, therefore, half-brother to Philip II of Spain.

Modern Reproduction of the Standard carried by the flagship of Don John of Austria



Spain, Genoa, Venice and the Papal States formed the backbone of the Christian fleet. On board the Spanish ship, Marquesa, was a young man who would later become known world-wide as the author of “Don Quixote”, Miguel de Cervantes.

Giorgio Vasari, Allegory of the Holy League
Italian, c. 1572
Vatican City, Apostolic Palace, Sala Regia
Here we see the Holy League, presented as a version of the Three Muses. They represent (from left to right) Spain, the Holy See and Venice. They are being given crowns of victory by winged putti. In the background are the two opposing fleets. On the right are figures representing the defeated Ottomans who are being attacked by fish and rats, dumped on them by angry putti. In the center, a putto catches our eye and directs our attention to a map of the engagement.



The ships of the Holy League met the Turkish fleet on October 7, 1571 off the coast of Greece, at Lepanto, which is now called the Gulf of Patras. 



Fernando Bertelli, The Battle of Lepanto
Italian, c. 1572
Vatican City, Apostolic Palace, Gallery of Maps



Both fleets were primarily composed of oared galleys. The ships of the Holy League gained a tremendous victory, sinking or capturing the majority of the ships in the Turkish fleet.1


Martin Rota, Battle Formations at Lepanto
Croatian, c. 1571 or later
Boston, Museum of Fine Arts


By all accounts, the battle was an extraordinarily ugly fight.2  The Turks lost not only a disproportionate number of ships, but huge numbers of sailors and soldiers, by some estimates as many as twice the Christian losses.



Adriaen Collaert, the Battle of Lepanto
Flemish, after 1571
London, Trustees of the British Museum



Contemporary or near-contemporary paintings and engravings suggest some of the ferocity of the battle and, especially, the rather tight engagements that were at its core.


Giorgio Vasari, Battle of Lepanto
Italian, c. 1572-1573
Vatican City, Apostolic Palace, Sala Regia



Luca Cambiaso, Battle of Lepanto
Italian, c. 1573
San Lorenzo del Escorial, Monastery of El Escorial




Andries van Eertvelt, the Battle of Lepanto
Flemish, c.1629
Private Collection



Andries van Eertvelt, the Battle of Lepanto
Flemish, c.1640
Private Collection



The victory helped to lift the pressure of Turkish aggression from the mainland Mediterranean countries. Although the Turks were able to replace the ships quickly, it took them much longer to replace the lost seamen. They continued to press into Central Europe by land for another hundred years, but the security Southern Europe gained from the victory of Lepanto helped to usher in the age of the Baroque in Italy and Spain.



Our Lady of the Rosary


Tommaso Dolabella, Battle of Lepanto
Italian, c. 1625-1630
Krakow, Wawel Castle
The painting is divided into two distinct zones, the land and the sea. On the left, the battle is being fought on land with prayer. We see a procession, including lay men and clerics, carrying a banner of the Blessed Virgin and including a priest carrying the Blessed Sacrament, imploring God's intercession on behalf of the Holy League. On the right the battle is being fought at sea. Prominently featured are the banners of the Venetian state, of the Papal States and of the House of Habsburg, as well as many banners bearing the crescent of the Ottoman Empire.



While the Holy League fleet was at sea the Pope had urged Catholic Europe to pray, in particular to pray the Rosary. The sailors and soldiers of the fleet were also urged to pray the Rosary before the battle began. The victory was, therefore, credited to Our Lady’s intercession. In gratitude, Pope Pius instituted the feast of Our Lady of Victory on October 7. The name of the feast was subsequently changed by his successor, Gregory XIII, to Our Lady of the Rosary, which is how we celebrate it to this day.


Johann Jakob Zeiller, Pope Pius V Prays to the Madonna and Child During
the Battle of Lepanto
German, c. 1762-1763
Ottobeuren, Monastery Church of Saints Theodore and Alexander





Franz Martin Kuen, Thanksgiving Procession and Feast of the Rosary at Rome
After the Victory at Lepanto
German, 1768
Erbach Alb-Donau-Kreis, Church of St. Martin



Many of the artists who have pictured the Battle of Lepanto were Venetian, quite appropriate since Venetian ships played a major part in the battle. Among them are the contemporary painters, Tintoretto, Titian and Veronese. 


Tintoretto seems to have done a painting of the battle shortly after the battle itself.  Unfortunately, his work was destroyed in a fire a few years after it was painted, but is known to us through a copy.  


Copy after Tintoretto, Battle of Lepanto
Italian, c. 1572
Destroyed by Fire 1577

It  undoubtedly served as the model for many of the paintings that followed.



Allegorical Interpretations

Titian’s picture “Philip II Offering the Infante Don Fernando To Heaven” is a predominantly secular image (Victory (or an angel) hands the palm of victory to Philip’s baby son, Ferdinand, as Philip holds him. In the background is a scene of the battle, in the foreground, a Turkish prisoner.  


Titian, Philip II Offering the Infante Don Fernando to Heaven
Italian, c. 1573-1575
Madrid, Museo Nacional del Prado



Titian also painted an allegorical picture which promoted Spain's leadership in the struggle against both the Muslim Turks and the emerging heresies of Protestant Northern Europe, while recalling the role the Spanish monarchy had played in the reconquest of Spain from the Muslim Moors.  Spain, personified as two warrior women (presumably representing the double crowns of Castille and Aragon), come to the aid of the near naked figure of Religion, who is beset and apparently wounded by serpents, which infest the tree stump behind her.  On the left we can see the burning ships of the Turkish fleet at Lepanto.  The two commissions together suggest how Philip II, who was the great-grandson of Ferdinand and Isabella, wished to be seen by the world.



Titian, Spain Comes to the Aid of Religion
Italian, 1572-1575
Madrid, Museo Nacional del Prado



On the other hand, Veronese’s picture “The Battle of Lepanto”, while giving us a view of the battle, actually celebrates the miraculous intercession of the Virgin Mary. The upper portion of the picture presents a view of heaven, where among the clouds and choirs of angels, the city of Venice, la Serenissima herself, clad in white, kneels before Our Lady. Saints, including Peter, Rocco, Justine and Mark, join her in supplication, urging Mary to intercede. From heaven rays of light fall to earth, underlining the intercession that she grants.



Paolo Veronese, Battle of Lepanto
Italian, c. 1572
Venice, Gallerie dell'Accademia



However, like Titian, Veronese also painted another work that offers a slightly more secular view of the battle and its aftermath.  This is The Allegory of the Battle of Lepanto, painted by Veronese in the late 1570s or early 1580s and possibly repainted in part sometime later.



Paolo Veronese Allegory of the Battle of Lepanto
Italian, c. 1577-1582
Venice, Palazzo Ducale

In it we see the victorious Venetian admiral, Sebastiano Venier, in his later years when he was Doge of Venice, being presented to Christ by Faith, holding a chalice, and St. Justine, holding the palm of martyrdom and the knife that killed her. Between them is the figure of the lion of St. Mark, one of the emblems of the Venetian Republic. Speculation has suggested that the figure now seen as Christ was originally that of St. Mark, the patron of Venice.  This seems a distinct possibility, especially since Christ appears to be holding an anchor stone, which would seem to be a more appropriate attribute of St. Mark.  In the left background there is a scene from the battle.  This heavenly reception for Venier is his reward for the victory.


Decline and Revival

Interest in the battle has declined over the intervening centuries, especially after the final defeat of the Ottoman Empire at the Battle of Vienna in 1683, which stopped further Ottoman invasions of Europe and began a long process of retreat and decline for the Ottomans.

Very few paintings were made after its memory was superseded by the internal European wars of the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.  

Juan Luna, The Battle of Lepanto
Filipino, 1887
Madrid, Palacio del Senado



One might think that, because Lepanto is now a widely ignored event, it has not been painted in the twentieth or twenty-first century. But, in 2001, the American artist, Cy Twombly, who lives in Rome, executed a twelve painting series , called “Lepanto” for the Venice Biennale.


Cy Twombly, Lepanto
American, 2001


Although abstract, the pictures do evoke the confusion and intensity of the battle and their bright colors recall both the rays of light from heaven in Veronese’s painting and the bloody decks of contemporary accounts. The cycle has since been exhibited in New York, Houston and Munich. So, there is still some resonance from the battle even in the secular world.


Cy Twombly, Lepanto
American, 2001



Cy Twombly, Lepanto
American, 2001


And so, every October 7th for the last 451 years Catholics have celebrated this victory that freed Southern Europe from a serious threat, guaranteed the continuing existence of Catholic Christianity and allowed a breathing space in which the arts could flourish.**

© M. Duffy, 2008, 2016.  Images updated and new images added, 2022.
____________________________________________
* For an account of the Ottoman's second attempt to take Vienna, see The Holy Name of Mary
** In 2024 Pope Francis has requested all Christians, Catholic and non-Catholic to devote October 7 to prayer and fasting for peace.  This is, in a way, a continuation of the call by Pope Pius V for recitation of the rosary leading up to the battle of Lepanto.  That victory brought a kind of peace and, one hopes, that prayer and fasting on October 7, 2024 will bring peace as well.

1.  For a summary of the battle and its importance see https://www.britannica.com/event/Battle-of-Lepanto
A longer and much more thorough description can be found in the recent book Empires of the Sea by Roger Crowley.
Crowley, Roger.  Empires of the Sea:  The Siege of Malta, the Battle of Lepanto and the Contest for the Center of the World, Random House, New York, 2009.

Also see Crowley, Empires of the Sea op cit.

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

The Presentation of Mary in the Temple





Bernart van Orley, Presentation of the Virgin
From a polyptych painted for the Brussels 
Beguinage
Flemish, 1520
Brussels, Musée du Centre public d'aide sociale



Drawing on earlier writings, like the Protoevangelion of James, the Golden Legend tells us 


“when she had accomplished the time of three years, and had left sucking, they brought her to the temple with offerings. And there was about the temple, after the fifteen psalms of degrees, fifteen steps or degrees to ascend up to the temple, because the temple was high set. And no body might go to the altar of sacrifices that was without, but by the degrees. And then our Lady was set on the lowest step, and mounted up without any help as she had been of perfect age, and when they had performed their offering, they left their daughter in the temple with the other virgins, and they returned into their place. And the Virgin Mary profited every day in all holiness, and was visited daily of angels, and had every day divine visions.”1


Although there is no evidence that any such group of temple virgins existed in Jerusalem, the belief that Mary was somehow set aside, even as a child was in existence by the middle of the second century when the Protoevangelion was written.


A feast of the Presentation of the Virgin Mary has been celebrated in the Eastern (Greek-speaking) Church since before the end of the first millennium, but it was not introduced into the Western (Latin-speaking) Church until the late 14th century. In the immediate aftermath of the Council of Trent its celebration was abolished by Pope Pius V (1568), but it was reinstituted shortly after by Pope Sixtus V (1585). Currently, the Presentation of the Virgin Mary is celebrated as a memorial on November 21. Since it is based on a non-Biblical source it is not a major feast.
  
Whatever the fate of the feast may have been, the story of Mary’s presentation and dedication to the service of God has been a significant inspiration to artists and their patrons. There is something fascinating in the theme of a small girl ascending a long staircase, alone, suspended as it were between the familiar world of home and parents and the amazing future that awaited her. And, in the medieval world, where small children were sometimes given to God as oblates in a monastic community, the experience was a lived one for some.

Perhaps most poignant in this sense of the small girl going forth into the future is the illumination from the Très Riches Heures of the Duc de Berry by Jean Colombe, who was chosen to complete the manuscript near the end of the 15th century. Here the tiny Mary is seen in isolation as she climbs the steps toward the waiting clergy, her mother and father left behind. The temple is represented by a Gothic cathedral. The gestures of Anne and Joachim seem to portray both prayerful reverence and sadness. They know that they have vowed her to the service of God and that the angelic messengers told them she would be great, but their expressions suggest that, for all that, they feel the same sadness as any parent does in seeing their little one set out into the world.



Jean Colombe, Presentation of the Virgin
From the Tres Riches Heures of the Duc de Berry
French, c. 1485-1480
Chantilly, Musée Condé
MS 65, fol. 137r


Similar emotions seem to pervade the interpretation of the scene by Paolo Uccello in the cathedral of Prato earlier in the 15th century. Here Anne and Joachim stand in prayer to one side of the staircase, while little Mary appears to rush gladly up the steps to the waiting High Priest.  On the right side of the composition some onlookers, clad in 15th-century clothing may include the kneeling donor of the painting.



Paolo Uccello, Presentation of the Virgin
Italian, c.1435
Prato, Cathedral


The vision of Giotto over 100 years earlier shows Anne taking a more active role in the scene. In the fresco from the Arena Chapel, Anne has climbed the steps with the slightly older Mary and, with a gesture that is both encouraging and protective, offers her to the High Priest. Joachim, meanwhile, stands at the bottom of the stairs, along with the servant who carries a basket with their material offering.


Giotto, Presentation of the Virgin
Italian, c. 1304-1306
Padua, Arena/Scrovegni Chapel




Fra Carnevale’s 1467 pendant to the Birth of the Virgin reduces the Presentation to an almost unreadable action, set in a vast temple structure that resembles a great early Christian basilica. Mary and Anne appear in the center of the foreground as a grand lady and her teenage daughter.

 

Fra Carnevale, Presentation of the Virgin
Italian, 1467
Boston, Museum of Fine Arts


They are accompanied by an entourage of three other women and two men, as they pass a group of beggars and a dog. Joachim is not included. The building they are about to enter is bustling with figures, predominantly elegantly dressed young men, going about their business or chatting together. It is only in the innermost part of the temple, at the end of more steps (but not a grand staircase) that we can see the tiny figures of the waiting clergy.



In the Tornabuoni Chapel frescoes in Florence’s Santa Maria Novella, Domenico Ghirlandaio similarly sets the action in the midst of much activity. However, his scene is easier to read than Fra Carnevale’s, as it sets Anne and Joachim apart, gives them appropriate clothing and haloes, includes the stairs and makes Mary the center of the painting.



Domenico Ghirlandaio, Presentation of the Virgin
Italian, 1486-1490
Florence, Church of Santa Maria Novella, Tornabuoni Chapel



At almost the same time that Vittore Carpaccio was creating the lovely, clear and contemplative vision now in the Brera Gallery in Milan, Albrecht Dürer, in Germany, was creating his image for the Life of the Virgin series of woodcuts.


Vittore Carpaccio, Presentation of the Virgin
Italian, 1504
Milan, Pinacoteca di Brera




Albrecht Dürer, Presentation of the Virgin,
from Life of the Virgin
German, 1503


Dürer’s vision is slightly disturbing. His Mary is shown almost disappearing behind a column, while Anne appears to be completely overcome with emotion. The scene is observed by moneychangers at their tables and sacrificial offerings occupy the front plane of the image.



The culmination of the pre-Trent image of the Presentation of the Virgin is surely Titian’s great painting of 1534, now in the Galleria dell’Accademia in Venice.


Titian, Presentation of the Virgin
Italian, 1534
Venice, Galleria dell'Accademia
  
Commissioned for the Scuola della Carità, a Venetian charitable institution, the painting was meant to sit on a long wall pierced by two doors; hence the unusual shape of the painting. Set in an expansive urban setting, the fearless Mary, surrounded by a heavenly light, mounts the stairs toward the waiting High Priest. It is not immediately clear which of the spectators are her parents, but they may be the two people kneeling at the foot of the stairs.  



Just prior to the suppression of the feast of the Presentation by Pope Pius V Daniele da Volterra offered a typically Mannerist composition in which the ostensible subject matter is almost lost in the multiplicity of irrelevant actions. Instead of focusing on the primary actors, Volterra distracts us with multiple unrelated figures that are also ascending and descending the temple stairs, all the while beset by resident beggars. Mary and her parents are seen from a distance only in the upper right corner of the composition.



Daniele da Volterra, Presentation of the Virgin
Italian, 1555
Rome, Church of Santa Trinità dei Monti



Following the reintroduction of the feast paintings on the subject continued to be produced.


The Antwerp Mannerist painter Denys Calvaert, who settled in Bologna, Italy, presents a traditional composition, although with typical Mannerist distortions of proportion and disturbingly tight compression of multiple figures in the compositional space.  In his rendering Mary's role as the new Eve is underscored by the placement of a "relief" image of the Temptation of Adam and Eve in the space at the base of the stairway.


Denys Calvaert, Presentation of the Virgin
Flemish, 1585-1600
Bologna, Pinacoteca Nationale




Pietro Testa's painting of the subject, from the 1640s, seems to represent a combination of Mannerist and classicizing Baroque styles, with its clearly classical figures squeezed into a somewhat contorted space and its fitful, flickering lighting effects.  Here strange figures emerge out of the half-light areas of the image, including the youth carrying the large candlestick.  They may possibly to be read as angels, in addition to the obvious air-borne angels in the upper right.



Pietro Testa, Presentation of the Virgin
Italian, c. 1641-1644
St. Petersburg, State Hermitage Museum




In contemporary, classicizing, France, the scene imagined by the 17th-century painter Eustace LeSueur has been stripped to essentials. Instead of multiple actors and much activity, we see an almost everyday scene as Anne escorts her daughter to the temple entrance, as three beggars appeal for alms.



Eustache LeSueur, Presentation of the Virgin
French, c.1641
St. Petersburg, State Hermitage Museum




In 18th-century Hungary, the Austrian painter Franz Anton Maulbertsch decorated the ceiling of a portion of the Episcopal residence in the town of Szombathely with a vision that, while harking back to some of the elaborate compositions of the Renaissance, is still simple and easy to read. We can easily identify the High Priest, Mary, Anne and Joachim.


Franz Anton Maulbertsch, Presentation of the Virgin
Austrian, 1782
Szombathely, Episcopal Residence

                                   

In late 19th-century Italy Prosper Piatti set his Presentation of the Virgin in a reconstructed space that shows the accumulated knowledge of a century of archaeology and study of middle Eastern culture. It is also the first image I have seen that includes other little girls among the welcoming group at the top of the temple stairs. The glances of Mary and Anne are directed, therefore, not to the High Priest, as in former versions, but toward these youngsters. This is the group that, presumably, Mary is to join. It also, to a certain extent, removes Mary from the supernatural level and places her on the natural level.  She no longer hastens upward to a mysterious, singular future but, like any child on her first day of school, looks to her classmates as her new reality.




Prosper Piatti, Presentation of the Virgin
Italian, 1899
Private Collection

_______________________________________
1. The Golden Legend or Lives of the Saints. Compiled by Jacobus de Voragine, Archbishop of Genoa, 1275. First Edition Published 1470. Englished by William Caxton, First Edition 1483, Edited by F.S. Ellis, Temple Classics, 1900 (Reprinted 1922, 1931.), Vol. 5, pages 47-54.

© M. Duffy, 2011/2012