Gerhard Remisch, Jesus Is Nailed to the Cross
German (stained glass), c.1538
London, Victoria and Albert Museum
|
Of all the Stations of the Cross, this one is probably the one that makes most people queasy. It forces us to face the reality of what this pilgrimage of the Stations of the Cross is really about. It is about a form of death, that is well-nigh unimaginable for most of us, in which a living human being is nailed to a cross by the hands and feet and then suspended in the air to die of blood loss and suffocation.
When I was a child there were doubts about the veracity of
the Christian tradition that Jesus was crucified by being nailed to the
cross through His hands and feet. The Gospels say that He
was crucified, without giving the details of how this was done, although in the apparitions to his disciples after the Resurrection Jesus invites them to probe
the wounds in His hands, feet and side. 1
In their own time there was no need for the Evangelists to describe crucifixion in detail, for it was still a current form of execution and many Christians and others endured it. In my childhood it was believed by scientists and even by theologians that the tradition must be wrong and that the Romans had simply bound people to the cross with ropes.
However, in 1968 a bombshell burst this assumption when archaeologists working in Israel discovered actual proof of the practice of nailing. Images of the heel bones of a young man crucified during the Jewish Revolt appeared in newspapers and magazines.
I still remember the moment when I saw the picture for the first time. One look was enough to make me a bit sick. The huge nail had pierced both heel bones and had gone clear through them. It had been driven in so far that it hit a hard knot in the wood of his cross, where it had become hooked. This hooking had preserved it, because it could not be withdrawn after death and removal from the cross. So, young Yehohanan, son of Hagakol, had to be buried with the nail still in his ankles, eventually to be found by the archaeologist Vassilios Tzaferis.2 Now we know.
Ankle bones of man crucified in 70AD Jerusalem, Israel Museum |
However, following the elimination of crucifixion as a punishment by Constantine in 337 AD our Christian ancestors did not know. 3 For several centuries no images of the Crucified Christ were made. It was not until more than 100 years after the abolition of crucifixion that the very first images appeared and they were primarily symbolic. The Christ on these crosses was alive and victorious with open eyes. Images of the Crucified Christ remained symbolic until well into the middle ages.
Earliest image of the Crucifixion, Wooden Doors Late Roman, 430-432 Rome, Church of Santa Sabina |
Crucifixion From the Rabbula Gospels Syrian *Beth Zagba), c. 586 Florence, Bibliotheca Medicea-Laurenziana MS. Plut. I. 56_12v-13r |
Crucifixion From the Gospels of Otto III German (Reichenau), c. 1000 Munich, Bayerisches Staatsbibliothek MS BSB Clm 4453, fol. 250v |
Crucifixion From the Book of Pericopes of Emperor Henry II German (Reichenau), c. 1007-1012 Munich, Bayerisches Staatsbibliothek MS BSB Clm 4452, fol. 107v |
Some show Jesus suspended by ropes on the cross while workers on ladders nail Him to it.
Jesus Nailed to the Cross
From Psalter
French (Paris), 1200-1225
Paris, Bibliotheque nationale de France
MS Nouvelle acquisiton latine 1392, fol. 11
|
Jesus is Nailed to the Cross From Vies de la Vierge et du Christ Italy (Naples), c. 1350 Paris, Bibliotheque nationale de France MS Francais 9561, fol. 176 |
Pseudo-Jacequemart, Jesus Nailed to the Cross
From Petites heurs de Jean de Berry
French (Bourges), c.1385-1390
Paris, Bibliotheque nationale de France
MS Latin 18014, fol. 162
|
Anonymous Alabaster Carver, Jesus is Nailed to the Cross English, 15th Century London, Victoria and Albert Museum |
It seems to have taken about 100 years to arrive at the logical solution, which is to show Jesus being nailed to the cross while the cross is lying flat on the ground. Once this realistic posture was arrived at it was universally adhered to and the images multiplied.
Master of Marguerite d'Orleans
Jesus Is Nailed to the Cross
From Hours of Marguerite d'Orleans
French (Rennes), c.1430
Paris, Bibliotheque nationale de France
MS Latin 1156, fol. 139
|
Guillaume Hugueniot. Jesus Nailed to the Cross From Hours of Pierre de Bosredont French (Langres), 1560-1570 New York, Pierpont Morgan Library MS G 55, fol. 24r |
Master of Jouvenel des Ursins, Scenes from the Crucifixion
From Book of Hours
French (Angers), 1465-1475
New York, Pierpont Morgan Library
MS M 263, fol. 27r
|
Gerard David, Jesus Is Nailed to the Cross
Belgian, ca. 1481
London, National Gallery
|
However, since no one had seen a crucifixion in centuries, no artist knew that to depict the actual method of crucifixion the nails would have to be driven into the wrists and the ankles, not into the center of the palms and the center of the feet. They had no idea that they were doing it wrong. So, the image of Jesus Crucified has always shown the nail marks in the centers of the hands and feet.
Circle Jan Gossart, Jesus Is Nailed to the Cross
Belgian, 1500-1549
Private Collection
|
Albrecht Durer, Jesus Is Nailed to the Cross
Part of the Seven Sorrows of Mary Altar
German, c.1500
Dresden, Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden
|
Peeter de Kempeneer, Jesus Is Nailed to the Cross
Flemish, c.1550
Ajaccio, Palais Fesch, Musée des Beaux-Arts
|
Workshop of Cornelis Cornelisz van Haarlem,
Dutch, 1600-1638
Kassel, Museumslandschaft Hessen
|
Nicolas de Poilly the Younger, Jesus Is Nailed to the Cross
French, 1697
Abbeville, Musée Boucher de Perthes
|
Giandomenico Tiepolo, Jesus Is Nailed to the Cross From The Stations of the Cross Italian, 1749 London, British Museum |
Gustave Moreau, Jesus Is Nailed to the Cross
French, 1862
Degazeville, Church
|
Eric Gill, Jesus Is Nailed to the Cross English, 1913-1918 London, Westminster Cathedral Here Eric Gill took a more restrained, quieter approach. |
© M. Duffy, 2016
1. Luke 24:39 and John 20:19; Luke 20:20 and John 20:24-29 (Doubting Thomas).
2. Biblical Archeology Society Staff, “A Tomb in Jerusalem Reveals the History of Crucifixion and Roman Crucifixion Methods”, July 22, 2011, Biblicalarchaeology.org. Includes the complete text of Vassilios Tzaferis, “Crucifixion—The Archaeological Evidence”, Biblical Archaeology Review, Jan/Feb 1985, pp 44-53. Both can be found at http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/crucifixion/a-tomb-in-jerusalem-reveals-the-history-of-crucifixion-and-roman-crucifixion-methods/
2. Biblical Archeology Society Staff, “A Tomb in Jerusalem Reveals the History of Crucifixion and Roman Crucifixion Methods”, July 22, 2011, Biblicalarchaeology.org. Includes the complete text of Vassilios Tzaferis, “Crucifixion—The Archaeological Evidence”, Biblical Archaeology Review, Jan/Feb 1985, pp 44-53. Both can be found at http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/crucifixion/a-tomb-in-jerusalem-reveals-the-history-of-crucifixion-and-roman-crucifixion-methods/
3.
Marucchi, Orazio. "Archæology of the
Cross and Crucifix." The Catholic Encyclopedia.
Vol. 4. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1908.
Vol. 4. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1908.
Scripture texts in this
work are taken from the New American Bible, revised edition© 2010,
1991, 1986, 1970 Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, Washington, D.C. and are
used by permission of the copyright owner. All Rights Reserved. No part of the
New American Bible may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing
from the copyright owner.
No comments:
Post a Comment